بحث:اطاله بررسی: تفاوت میان نسخه‌ها

{{چپ‌چین}}According to the Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Ballin (1892), changes to Senate rules could be achieved by a simple majority. Nevertheless, under current Senate rules, a rule change itself could be filibustered, with the votes of two-thirds of those senators present and voting (as opposed to the normal three-fifths of those sworn) needed to end debate.[1] Despite this written requirement, the possibility exists that the Senate's presiding officer could on motion declare a Senate rule unconstitutional, which decision can be uphelduphold by a simple majority vote of the Senate.{{پایان چپ‌چین}}